Ek Prayaas Badlav ki Aur

Landmark Verdict: ₹20 Lakh Defamation Claim Rejected as Court Rules Divorce Pleas and Police Complaints Are Legally Protected

1

🔷 Court Clarifies: Statements Made in Court or Police Complaints Are Not Defamation

📌 Case Overview
In an important judgment, the Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, dismissed a civil defamation suit seeking ₹20 lakh in damages and a permanent injunction. The court held that statements made in judicial proceedings or in police complaints do not automatically amount to defamation when protected by legal privilege. (20 lakh defamation claim rejected)

📌 What Was the Dispute?
The plaintiff (wife) filed a civil suit alleging that her husband had defamed her by making allegations of adultery and involvement in obscene videos:

In a divorce petition filed before a competent court

In a police complaint submitted to senior police authorities

She claimed these allegations harmed her reputation and goodwill.

📌 Court’s Findings
The court observed that:

Statements made in a divorce petition are part of judicial proceedings and are protected by Absolute Privilege.

Complaints made to the police for investigation or personal protection fall under Qualified Privilege, provided they are not motivated by malice.

The plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant acted with malicious intent.

Evidence on record indicated that the allegations were not baseless.

📌 Final Verdict
The court:

Dismissed the defamation suit in entirety

Rejected the claim for ₹20 lakh in damages

Declined to grant permanent injunction

Directed both parties to bear their own costs

📌 Significance of the Judgment

This judgment reinforces the principle that approaching courts or police authorities with allegations, when done in good faith, cannot be treated as defamation. It provides clarity and protection to individuals seeking legal remedies in matrimonial and related disputes. (20 lakh defamation claim rejected)

Read Full Judgement

Final_Order_Masked (1)
1 Comment
  1. Sadiq Shariff says

    A well thought judgement.
    The false case instigator should be dealt in this way.
    Appreciate the service of this foundation.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.